How is the social cognitive perspective of personality different from the other perspectives quizlet?

Recommended textbook solutions

How is the social cognitive perspective of personality different from the other perspectives quizlet?

HDEV5

6th EditionSpencer A. Rathus

380 solutions

How is the social cognitive perspective of personality different from the other perspectives quizlet?

Social Psychology

10th EditionElliot Aronson, Robin M. Akert, Timothy D. Wilson

525 solutions

How is the social cognitive perspective of personality different from the other perspectives quizlet?

Consumer Behavior: Buying, Having, Being

13th EditionMichael R Solomon

449 solutions

How is the social cognitive perspective of personality different from the other perspectives quizlet?

Myers' Psychology for the AP Course

3rd EditionC. Nathan DeWall, David G Myers

955 solutions

Recommended textbook solutions

How is the social cognitive perspective of personality different from the other perspectives quizlet?

Consumer Behavior: Buying, Having, Being

13th EditionMichael R Solomon

449 solutions

How is the social cognitive perspective of personality different from the other perspectives quizlet?

Myers' Psychology for AP

2nd EditionDavid G Myers

900 solutions

How is the social cognitive perspective of personality different from the other perspectives quizlet?

HDEV5

6th EditionSpencer A. Rathus

380 solutions

How is the social cognitive perspective of personality different from the other perspectives quizlet?

Social Psychology

10th EditionElliot Aronson, Robin M. Akert, Timothy D. Wilson

525 solutions

Who first proposed the social-cognitive perspective, and how do social-cognitive theorists view personality development?
Albert Bandura first proposed the social-cognitive perspective, which views personality as the product of the interaction between a person's traits (including thinking) and the situation—the social context.

The behavioral approach contributes an understanding that our personality development is affected by learned responses.

Social-cognitive researchers apply principles of learning, as well as cognition and social behavior, to personality.

Reciprocal determinism is a term describing the interaction and mutual influence of behavior, internal personal factors, and environmental factors.

Research on how we interact with our environment evolved into research on the effects of optimism and pessimism, which led to a broader positive psychology.

59-2 How do social-cognitive researchers explore behavior, and what criticism have they faced?
Social-cognitive researchers tend to believe that the best way to predict someone's behavior in a given situation is to observe that person's behavior in similar situations.

They have been faulted for underemphasizing the importance of unconscious dynamics, emotions, and inner traits. Their response is that the social-cognitive perspective builds on psychology's well-established concepts of learning and cognition and reminds us of the power of situations.

59-3 Why has psychology generated so much research on the self? How important is self-esteem to psychology and to human well-being?
The self is the center of personality, organizing our thoughts, feelings, and actions.

Considering possible selves helps motivate us toward positive development, but focusing too intensely on ourselves can lead to the spotlight effect.

High self-esteem (our feeling of self-worth) is beneficial, but unrealistically high self-esteem is dangerous (linked to aggressive behavior) and fragile.

Self-efficacy is our sense of competence.

59-4 What evidence reveals self-serving bias, and how do defensive and secure self-esteem differ?
Self-serving bias is our tendency to perceive ourselves favorably, as when viewing ourselves as better than average or when accepting credit for our successes but not blame for our failures.

Defensive self-esteem is fragile, focuses on sustaining itself, and views failure or criticism as a threat.

Secure self-esteem enables us to feel accepted for who we are.

59-5 How do individualist and collectivist cultures influence people?
Within any culture, the degree of individualism or collectivism varies from person to person. Cultures based on self-reliant individualism, like those found in North America and Western Europe, tend to value personal independence and individual achievement. They define identity in terms of self-esteem, personal goals and attributes, and personal rights and liberties. Cultures based on socially connected collectivism, like those in many parts of Asia and Africa, tend to value interdependence, tradition, and harmony, and they define identity in terms of group goals, commitments, and belonging to one's group.

How is the social cognitive perspective of personality different from the other perspectives?

There are many different schools of thought about personality in psychology, including the psychoanalytic, humanistic, trait, and behaviorist theories. The social cognitive perspective definition of personality is distinct in that it assumes that personality is a result of choice and reaction to the environment.

What is the social cognitive perspective on personality and how does it differ from the psychoanalytic perspective?

Key Takeaways: Personality The social cognitive perspective says that personality and environment influence each other, and the humanistic perspective focuses on the positive and healthy aspects of personality. The psychoanalytic perspective is a controversial theory of personality that has evolved over time.

How does the social cognitive perspective view personality?

The Social Cognitive Theory of Personality posits that personality is shaped by interacting social factors, cognitive factors, and behavior. Social factors refer to those that are learned through observation. Cognitive factors stem from cognitive interpretations of the observed social environment.

What is social cognitive perspective quizlet?

Social Cognitive Perspective. Views behaviour as influenced by the interaction between people and their social acts; Emphasize the importance of cognition before, during, and after an event or situation.