So sánh 750m và 750 ti năm 2024

Chúng tôi so sánh hai GPU Nền tảng di động: 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 750M và 1024MB VRAM GeForce 705M để xem GPU nào có hiệu suất tốt hơn trong các thông số kỹ thuật chính, kiểm tra đánh giá, tiêu thụ điện năng, v.v.

Cấu hình max setting của VLTK3d ngày xưa nó cũng tương tự như thế này , đây là phiên bản Trung Quốc với 1 số cải tiến khác thôi , còn cấu hình vẫn vậy

GTX 750 Ti được cỡ Mid bạn có thể tham khảo thêm tại đây http://xw.jx3.xoyo.com/download/

Hiện nay cũng nhiều người Vn vẫn chơi ở bên sv trung quốc ( do VNG điều chuyển dữ liệu acc sang bên kingsoft TQ ) , mình đang chơi với cấu hình i5-8gb ram - gtx 770 và cũng chỉ kéo được mức High chứ không thê cao nhất😃 thi thoảng vẫn giật nhẹ

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640768CUDA cores640no dataCore clock speed1020 MHz967 MHzBoost clock speed1085 MHzno dataNumber of transistors1,870 million1300 MillionManufacturing process technology28 nm28 nmPower consumption (TDP)60 Wattno dataTexture fill rate43.40no dataFloating-point performance1,389 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 750 Ti and GeForce GT 750M SLI compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalargeBus supportPCI Express 3.0no dataInterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no dataLength5.7" (14.5 cm)no dataHeight4.376" (11.1 cm)no dataWidth2-slotno dataSupplementary power connectorsNoneno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3, GDDR5Maximum RAM amount4 GB2x 2 GBMemory bus width128 Bit2x 128 BitMemory clock speed5.4 GB/s2000 - 5000 MHzMemory bandwidth86.4 GB/sno dataShared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMIno dataMulti monitor support4 displaysno dataHDMI+no dataHDCP+no dataMaximum VGA resolution2048x1536no dataAudio input for HDMIInternalno data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+no data3D Gaming+no data3D Vision+no data3D Vision Live+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11Shader Model5.1no dataOpenGL4.6no dataOpenCL1.2no dataVulkan1.1.126no dataCUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 750 Ti outperforms GT 750M SLI by 46% in our combined benchmark results.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 750 Ti outperforms GT 750M SLI by 34% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 750 Ti outperforms GT 750M SLI by 16% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 750 Ti outperforms GT 750M SLI by 16% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 750 Ti outperforms GT 750M SLI by 33% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 750 Ti outperforms GT 750M SLI by 23% in Unigine Heaven 3.0.

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 750 Ti and GeForce GT 750M SLI. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 183 Mh/s no data Decred / DCR (Decred) 0.51 Gh/s no data Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 2.3 Mh/s no data Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 0.25 kh/s no data Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) 74.4 Sol/s no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Performance in popular games

Full HD Low Preset

Cyberpunk 207716−18 10−12

Full HD Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey21−24

+50%

14−16

−50%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla14−16

+114%

7−8

−114%

Battlefield 530−35

+54.5%

21−24

−54.5%

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare27−30

+35%

20−22

−35%

Cyberpunk 207716−18

+45.5%

10−12

−45.5%

Far Cry 524−27

+56.3%

16−18

−56.3%

Far Cry New Dawn27−30

+58.8%

16−18

−58.8%

Forza Horizon 435−40

+45.8%

24−27

−45.8%

Hitman 324−27

+62.5%

16−18

−62.5%

Horizon Zero Dawn20−22

+53.8%

12−14

−53.8%

Red Dead Redemption 216−18

+41.7%

12−14

−41.7%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider21−24

+31.3%

16−18

−31.3%

Watch Dogs: Legion18−20

+80%

10−11

−80%

Full HD High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey21−24

+50%

14−16

−50%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla14−16

+114%

7−8

−114%

Battlefield 530−35

+54.5%

21−24

−54.5%

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare27−30

+35%

20−22

−35%

Cyberpunk 207716−18

+45.5%

10−12

−45.5%

Far Cry 524−27

+56.3%

16−18

−56.3%

Far Cry New Dawn27−30

+58.8%

16−18

−58.8%

Forza Horizon 435−40

+45.8%

24−27

−45.8%

Hitman 324−27

+62.5%

16−18

−62.5%

Horizon Zero Dawn20−22

+53.8%

12−14

−53.8%

Metro Exodus14−16

+50%

10−11

−50%

Red Dead Redemption 216−18

+41.7%

12−14

−41.7%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider21−24

+31.3%

16−18

−31.3%

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt21−24

+50%

14−16

−50%

Watch Dogs: Legion18−20

+80%

10−11

−80%

Full HD Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey21−24

+50%

14−16

−50%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla14−16

+114%

7−8

−114%

Battlefield 530−35

+54.5%

21−24

−54.5%

Cyberpunk 207716−18

+45.5%

10−12

−45.5%

Far Cry 524−27

+56.3%

16−18

−56.3%

Far Cry New Dawn27−30

+58.8%

16−18

−58.8%

Forza Horizon 435−40

+45.8%

24−27

−45.8%

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt21−24

+50%

14−16

−50%

Watch Dogs: Legion18−20

+80%

10−11

−80%

1440p High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare14−16

+50%

10−11

−50%

Hitman 316−18

+45.5%

10−12

−45.5%

Horizon Zero Dawn16−18

+33.3%

12−14

−33.3%

Metro Exodus8−9

+60%

5−6

−60%

Red Dead Redemption 27−8

+40%

5−6

−40%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider12−14

+30%

10−11

−30%

1440p Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey9−10

+80%

5−6

−80%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla5−6 0−1 Battlefield 516−18

+143%

7−8

−143%

Cyberpunk 20775−6

+66.7%

3−4

−66.7%

Far Cry 516−18

+45.5%

10−12

−45.5%

Far Cry New Dawn16−18

+88.9%

9−10

−88.9%

Forza Horizon 418−20

+63.6%

10−12

−63.6%

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt10−11

+66.7%

6−7

−66.7%

Watch Dogs: Legion5−6

+150%

2−3

−150%

4K High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare7−8

+40%

5−6

−40%

Hitman 39−10

+50%

6−7

−50%

Horizon Zero Dawn9−10

+12.5%

8−9

−12.5%

Metro Exodus4−5

+300%

1−2

−300%

Red Dead Redemption 25−6

+25%

4−5

−25%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider5−6

+66.7%

3−4

−66.7%

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt8−9

+100%

4−5

−100%

4K Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey5−6

+66.7%

3−4

−66.7%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla4−5

+100%

2−3

−100%

Battlefield 58−9

+167%

3−4

−167%

Cyberpunk 20771−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

Far Cry 58−9

+33.3%

6−7

−33.3%

Far Cry New Dawn10−12

+22.2%

9−10

−22.2%

Forza Horizon 412−14

+62.5%

8−9

−62.5%

Watch Dogs: Legion3−4

+200%

1−2

−200%

This is how GTX 750 Ti and GT 750M SLI compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

• GT 750M SLI is 14% faster than GTX 750 Ti

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

• in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 750 Ti is 300% faster than the GT 750M SLI.

All in all, in popular games:

• GTX 750 Ti is ahead in 66 tests (99%)
• there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score 10.05 6.87 Recency 18 February 2014 1 April 2013 Pipelines / CUDA cores 640 768

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 750M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 750 Ti is a desktop card while GeForce GT 750M SLI is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your own vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

GeForce GT 750M SLI

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.