There is an inverse relationship between degree of operating leverage and the margin of safety

Our discussion of CVP analysis has focused on the sales necessary to break even or to reach a desired profit, but two other concepts are useful regarding our break-even sales. Those concepts are margin of safety and operating leverage.

A company’s margin of safety is the difference between its current sales and its break-even sales. The margin of safety tells the company how much they could lose in sales before the company begins to lose money, or, in other words, before the company falls below the break-even point. The higher the margin of safety is, the lower the risk is of not breaking even or incurring a loss. In order to calculate margin of safety, we use the following formula:

There is an inverse relationship between degree of operating leverage and the margin of safety
Figure 7.40 By: Rice University Source: Openstax CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Let’s look at Manteo Machine, a company that machines parts that are then sold and used in the manufacture of farm equipment. For their core product, the break-even analysis is as follows:

There is an inverse relationship between degree of operating leverage and the margin of safety
Figure 7.41 By: Rice University Source: Openstax CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Long Description

Interpreting this information tells Manteo Machine that, when sales equal $153,000, they will be at the break-even point. However, as soon as sales fall below this figure, they will have negative net operating income. They have decided that they want a margin of safety of $10,000. They can add this as if it were a fixed cost (very much the same way we added target profit earlier) and then find a new break-even point that includes a $10,000 margin of safety. If they approached it from this perspective, their new break-even would appear as follows:

As shown in Figure 7.42, the margin of safety of 1,900 units is found from (FC + Margin of Safety) ÷ CM per unit = $95,000 ÷ $50. Thus, 1,900 units must be sold in order to meet fixed cost and have a $10,000 margin of safety. Another way to see this is to realize the $10,000 margin of safety will be met in $50 increments based on the current contribution margin. This means the company will need to sell an additional 200 units, which is an additional $18,000 in sales to have the desired margin of safety. The true break-even, where only fixed costs were met, was 1,700 units, or $153,000 in sales. The point at which the company would have a $10,000 margin of safety is 1,900 units, or $171,000 in sales. Note that the new level of units is the break-even units of 1,700 plus the 200 units for the margin of safety. The same can be seen for the sales dollar. The new level of desired sales dollars is the break-even sales of $153,000 plus the additional $18,000 in sales for the margin of safety.

The margin of safety can also be determined when a company knows its sales volume. For example, Manteo Machine sold 2,500 units in March and wants to know its margin of safety at that sales volume:

There is an inverse relationship between degree of operating leverage and the margin of safety
Figure 7.43 By: Rice University Source: Openstax CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

From this analysis, Manteo Machine knows that sales will have to decrease by $72,000 from their current level before they revert to break-even operations and are at risk to suffer a loss.

Many companies prefer to consider the margin of safety as a percentage of sales, rather than as a dollar amount. In order to express margin of safety as a percentage, we divide the margin of safety (in dollars) by the total budgeted or actual sales volume. The formula to express margin of safety as a percentage is:

There is an inverse relationship between degree of operating leverage and the margin of safety
Figure 7.44 By: Rice University Source: Openstax CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Previously, we calculated Manteo Machine’s margin of safety as $72,000. As a percentage, it would be

$72,000$225,000=0.32or32%

This tells management that as long as sales do not decrease by more than 32%, they will not be operating at or near the break-even point, where they would run a higher risk of suffering a loss. Often, the margin of safety is determined when sales budgets and forecasts are made at the start of the fiscal year and also are regularly revisited during periods of operational and strategic planning.

Long Descriptions

Sales Price per Unit $90 less Variable Cost per Unit $40 equals Contribution Margin per Unit $50. Fixed Costs plus Margin of Safety $95,000, Break-Even in units 1900. Contribution Margin per Unit $50 divided by Selling Price per Unit $90 equals Contribution Margin Ratio 55.55 percent, Break-Even in dollars, rounded $170,000. Return

Chapter 9-Break-Even Point and Cost-Volume-Profit Analysis: True/False

Uploaded by

ANNE PAMELA TIU

0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)

2K views34 pages

Document Information

click to expand document information

Original Title

CVP.doc

Copyright

© © All Rights Reserved

Available Formats

RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

  • Share on Facebook, opens a new window

    Facebook

  • Share on Twitter, opens a new window

    Twitter

  • Share on LinkedIn, opens a new window

    LinkedIn

  • Share with Email, opens mail client

    Email

  • Copy Link

    Copy Link

Did you find this document useful?

0%0% found this document useful, Mark this document as useful

0%0% found this document not useful, Mark this document as not useful

Is this content inappropriate?

Report this Document

Download now

SaveSave CVP.doc For Later

0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)

2K views34 pages

Chapter 9-Break-Even Point and Cost-Volume-Profit Analysis: True/False

Original Title:

CVP.doc

Uploaded by

ANNE PAMELA TIU

Full description

SaveSave CVP.doc For Later

0%0% found this document useful, Mark this document as useful

0%0% found this document not useful, Mark this document as not useful

Embed

Share

Print

Download now

Jump to Page

You are on page 1of 34

Search inside document

You're Reading a Free Preview
Pages 7 to 8 are not shown in this preview.

Buy the Full Version

You're Reading a Free Preview
Pages 12 to 17 are not shown in this preview.

Buy the Full Version

You're Reading a Free Preview
Pages 21 to 31 are not shown in this preview.

Buy the Full Version

Reward Your Curiosity

Everything you want to read.

Anytime. Anywhere. Any device.

No Commitment. Cancel anytime.

There is an inverse relationship between degree of operating leverage and the margin of safety

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

  • Share on Facebook, opens a new window
  • Share on Twitter, opens a new window
  • Share on LinkedIn, opens a new window
  • Share with Email, opens mail client
  • Copy Link

Quick navigation

  • Home

  • Books

  • Audiobooks

  • Documents

    , active

What is the relationship between the margin of safety and the break

The margin of safety measures the units sold or the revenue earned above the break-even volume. If the break-even point increases, the margin of safety increases. Companies with a greater proportion of fixed costs have a greater risk of loss than companies with a greater proportion of variable costs.

What is the break

A company's breakeven point is the point at which its sales exactly cover its expenses. Fixed Costs ÷ (Price - Variable Costs) = Breakeven Point in Units. Pricing a product, the costs incurred in a business, and sales volume are interrelated.

What is the margin of safety ratio quizlet?

The margin of safety ratio is equal to the margin of safety in dollars divided by the actual or (expected) sales. remains constant per unit with changes in the level of activity.

What is break

The break-even point is the point at which total cost and total revenue are equal, meaning there is no loss or gain for your small business. In other words, you've reached the level of production at which the costs of production equals the revenues for a product.