Which of the following did the Supreme Court establish in Marbury v. Madison quizlet?

Recommended textbook solutions

Magruder's American Government

1st EditionSavvas Learning Co

555 solutions

United States Government: Our Democracy

1st EditionDonald A. Ritchie, Richard C. Remy

1,148 solutions

TEKS United States Government

1st EditionDonald A. Ritchie, Richard C. Remy

1,148 solutions

Magruder's American Government

1st EditionDaniel M. Shea

602 solutions

Recommended textbook solutions

Magruder's American Government

1st EditionSavvas Learning Co

555 solutions

Magruder's American Government, Florida Student Edition

1st EditionDaniel M. Shea

602 solutions

United States Government: Our Democracy

1st EditionDonald A. Ritchie, Richard C. Remy

1,148 solutions

Government in America: Elections and Updates Edition

16th EditionGeorge C. Edwards III, Martin P. Wattenberg, Robert L. Lineberry

269 solutions

Upgrade to remove ads

Only SGD 41.99/year

  1. Social Science
  2. Political Science
  3. Politics of the United States

  • Flashcards

  • Learn

  • Test

  • Match

  • Flashcards

  • Learn

  • Test

  • Match

Terms in this set [17]

Marbury v. Madison

*In 1803
*Talking about constitutional law
*Case decided when John Marshall as the fourth Chief Justice of the U.S.

The principle for which Marbury v. Madison is remembered is:

Judicial review

Judicial review

That the Supreme Court of the U.S. has the power to review a law passed by Congress and determine whether the law is constitutional.

Court declares:

"A law repugnant to the constitution is void."

Court said:

Through dicta, said that Marbury was entitled to his commission. But to compel the Secretary of Sate Madison to deliver the commission to Marbury, the court would have to issue a "write of mandamus".

Writ of mandamus

Writ commands a public official to perform his duty.

Did the U.S. Supreme Court have the power to issue the writ?

*Court looked at the U.S. Constitution.
*Constitution limits the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction to two types of cases

Two types of cases constitution limits Supreme Court's original jurisdiction:

1. Cases affecting ambassadors and other public Ministers and Consuls
2. Those in which a State shall be a Party.
*In all other cases the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction.
*So the U.S. Supreme Court can't be the first court to hear a case unless the case affects an ambassador or a state is a party.

The notion of "jurisdiction"

Is crucial to law:
*If a court has jurisdiction over a case, it means the court has power to hear the case.
*If the court doesn't have jurisdiction, the court doesn't have the power to hear the case.

Court must have two kinds of jurisdictions:

1. Jurisdiction over the subject matter
2. Jurisdiction over the person
*In Marbury te problem was one of the subject-matter jurisdiction.

Act passed by congress:

*Congress had passed an Act establishing federal courts, which President Busch signed.
*Congress was expressly allowed to establish courts by the constitution.
* But the act also authorized the U.S. Supreme Court "to issue writs of mandamus" to "persons holding office under the authority of the United States." [Secretary of State Madison fit the description]

So did the U.S. Supreme Court have the power to issue a writ of mandamus to Madison to compel Madison to deliver the Commission to Marbury?

*An Act of Congress, signed by the president, said the Court had that power.
*But on the other hand, there stood the U.S. Constitution, Article 3 and it denied the Supreme Court original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus.

What did the court do?

Marbury v. Madison decided that the Act passed by Congress, which said the Supreme Court could issue a writ of mandamus, was not law.
*So the Court answered "no" it did not have power to issue the writ.

Court declared:

That "a law repugnant to the Constitution is void" and declared for itself a vast power of judicial review.
*The Court said that it could review Acts passed by Congress and declare them unconstitutional and therefore void.

So does Marbury get the job?

No.
*Jefferson maintained the most of Marbury v. Madison was dicta.

Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes

*Was on Supreme court from 1902 to 1932.
*Known as "the Great Dissenter."
*Said "I don't think the U.S. would come to an end if we lost our power to declare an Act of Congress void."

What to remember:

Marbury v. Madison started the doctrine of judicial revue-the doctrine that the U.S. Supreme Court can review Acts of Congress and find them unconstitutional and therefore void.
*Then the court assumed if they could review Acts of Congress and declare them to be unconstitutional, the it could review Acts of state legislatures and declare them to be unconstitutional.

Recommended textbook solutions

Magruder's American Government

1st EditionSavvas Learning Co

555 solutions

United States Government: Our Democracy

1st EditionDonald A. Ritchie, Richard C. Remy

1,148 solutions

Magruder's American Government

1st EditionDaniel M. Shea

602 solutions

American Government

1st EditionGlen Krutz

412 solutions

Sets with similar terms

Judicial Branch Unit 4 Test

41 terms

reese_johnston

Article 3

27 terms

Katherine_Egan

Chapter 14

32 terms

htownqbannene

ch 14

96 terms

adammichael_young

Sets found in the same folder

AP Gove Court Cases

11 terms

lfulcaysdh

Chap 10 Vocab

24 terms

emmaarnold1213

AP Government

164 terms

Lyndsay_Merz

Chap 11 Vocab

15 terms

emmaarnold1213

Other sets by this creator

Criminology: Chapter Six

11 terms

DBMY95

Criminality Chapter Five

13 terms

DBMY95

IMC Sample Test Questions

13 terms

DBMY95

IMC Study Guide Part Five

7 terms

DBMY95

Other Quizlet sets

POS 4624- Exam 1

57 terms

KCabrera012

American Government Final: The Judicial Branch

45 terms

tara_seyoum7

Judicial Branch Final

19 terms

hmaleksiev

Landmark Court Cases: Civics-

83 terms

BestStudent6

Related questions

QUESTION

list the first five offices in line to the presidency according to the presidential succession act of 1947.

4 answers

QUESTION

what is the second step of the impeachment process

15 answers

QUESTION

Direct Democracy is best defined as a state of continual revolution.

2 answers

QUESTION

Where are triable either way offences heard?

15 answers

What did Marbury vs Madison establish in the Supreme Court?

With his decision in Marbury v. Madison, Chief Justice John Marshall established the principle of judicial review, an important addition to the system of “checks and balances” created to prevent any one branch of the Federal Government from becoming too powerful.

What was the outcome of the case Marbury v. Madison quizlet?

The significance of Marbury v. Madison was that it was the first U.S. Supreme Court case to apply "Judicial Review", and it allowed the Supreme Court to rule laws unconstitutional.

What three things does the Court decide in in Marbury v. Madison?

Marbury v. Madison strengthened the federal judiciary by establishing for it the power of judicial review, by which the federal courts could declare legislation, as well as executive and administrative actions, inconsistent with the U.S. Constitution [“unconstitutional”] and therefore null and void.

Chủ Đề