Which of the following roles should internal audit not undertake in terms of risk management?

In today’s world, processes and operations have become more complex and new risks have emerged. Organizations are trying to give more considerations to risk management; however, they struggle with the decision of differentiating the internal audit functions and risk management functions. The best approach is to have a separate internal audit and risk management function, but operationally this is difficult to implement, time consuming and is costly. Most organizations have internal audit functions but do not have a risk management function. Therefore, the internal audit function undertakes the risk function in organizations without an effective risk management function.

Which of the following roles should internal audit not undertake in terms of risk management?

The three levels of defense in an effective Risk Management Control Framework is Operational Management as the first line of defense, Risk management as the second level defense function and internal audit as the third level of defense responsible for entity wide assurance. The main role of the internal audit in risk management is providing an assurance on the effectiveness of the risk management process. 

However, in cases where they play the same role, Internal Audit takes up a consultative role in risk management. This is done through assessing and monitoring risks that an organization faces, providing recommendations for appropriate risk mitigation controls, assessment of the system’s internal controls and assessing the governance processes in an organization. The following are roles that internal audit should not undertake setting the risk appetite, imposing risk management processes, taking decisions on risk response, implementing risk responses on management’s behalf and accountability for risk management. These roles majorly lie on the operational management.

If Internal Audit and Risk Management is performed as one role, these are some of the recommended actions internal auditors can take to help their organization adopt a more strategic risk management focus:

      1. Ensuring that the risk assessment identifies those risks presenting the most significant risks to shareholder value.
      2. Facilitating risk management discussions across the organization.
      3. Viewing risk management as a core competency and ensuring that auditors receive appropriate training on risk and risk management practices.
      4. Reviewing business plans to determine whether they assess the risks embedded in their strategies and have risk monitoring and trigger points.
      5. Reviewing the annual report to determine whether risks are addressed appropriately.
      6. Continuously monitoring and assessing stakeholder expectations relative to risk and risk management, as well as assisting in the education of these stakeholders.
      7. Building a stronger relationship with other risk and control business functions to drive an enhanced process to identify emerging risks.
      8. Identifying and sharing best practices in risk management. 

If the internal audit and risk management function is the played as one role, it is advised that reporting is done to two different managers for clear governance and non-bias.

An internal audit function that is properly organized plays a very important role in the organization by understanding the system of internal controls, effectiveness of key controls, governance & effectiveness of the risk management processes.

To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below:

Laura de Zwaan (Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics, Griffith Business School, Griffith University, Meadowbrook, Australia)

Jenny Stewart (Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics, Griffith Business School, Griffith University, Meadowbrook, Australia)

Nava Subramaniam (School of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business and Law, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia)

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of internal auditors' involvement in enterprise risk management (ERM) on perceptions of their willingness to report a breakdown in risk procedures and whether a strong relationship with the audit committee affects such willingness to report. The study also investigates the use of ERM and the role of internal audit in ERM in Australian private and public sector entities.

Design/methodology/approach

The study uses an experimental design, manipulating the internal auditor's involvement in ERM and the strength of the relationship between internal audit and the audit committee. Participants are 117 certified internal auditors. The study also gathers descriptive data on the use of ERM.

Findings

The study indicates that a high involvement in ERM impacts the perceptions of internal auditors' willingness to report a breakdown in risk procedures to the audit committee. However, a strong relationship with the audit committee does not appear to affect their perceived willingness to report. The study also finds that the majority of organisations have recently adopted ERM. Internal auditors are involved in ERM assurance activities but some also engage in activities that could compromise objectivity.

Research limitations/implications

There are internal and external validity threats associated with the experimental design.

Practical implications

The findings reinforce the need for organisations to adhere to the recommendations of the Institute of Internal Auditors and to ensure that internal auditors do not play an inappropriate role in ERM.

Originality/value

The paper contributes to our understanding of the impact of involvement in ERM on internal audit objectivity and of the current role of internal audit in ERM in Australia.

Keywords

  • Australia
  • Public sector
  • Private sector
  • Internal auditing
  • Enterprise risk management
  • Audit committees

Citation

de Zwaan, L., Stewart, J. and Subramaniam, N. (2011), "Internal audit involvement in enterprise risk management", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 26 No. 7, pp. 586-604. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686901111151323

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2011, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Which of the following roles in the risk management process should not be undertaken by the internal audit activity?

The following are roles that internal audit should not undertake setting the risk appetite, imposing risk management processes, taking decisions on risk response, implementing risk responses on management's behalf and accountability for risk management. These roles majorly lie on the operational management.

Which of the following are roles that the internal audit activity should not undertake since they would threaten its independence and objectivity?

Being accountable for risk management. Which of the following are roles that the internal audit activity should not undertake since they would threaten its independence and objectivity? Making decisions on risk responses.

What is risk management in internal auditing?

What is Risk Management? The objective of risk management is to help identify and document the organization's risks in critical business processes and the internal controls within each process to mitigate those risks.

What is the role of internal audit as it relates to risk management to contribute to the improvement of risk management processes?

Their role is to assist decision-makers in arriving at the most appropriate treatment of risks and then the monitoring and review of risks and controls.