How does the self concept of older adults and younger adults differ?

Results

Assessment of the baseline state

The analyses based on the baseline state of the participants showed no differences between age groups, except for arousal. Specifically, the younger participants showed greater subjective arousal [t(105) = 3.45, p = .001, d = 0.69] and greater physiological arousal (SCL) [t(105) = 2.67, p = .009, d = 0.51] compared with the older adults. These results suggest that, before starting the mood induction procedure, the older adults presented lower emotional arousal than the younger participants.

Ability to identify the target emotions

The discriminant analysis (DA) based on the ability to identify the target emotions showed that the young adults correctly classified a higher percentage of all negative emotions [disgust = 94.12, fear = 89.71, anger = 89.71, sadness = 83.82, total = 95.59] than the older adults [disgust = 43.59, fear = 51.28, anger = 33.33, sadness = 66.67, total = 87.18]. Likewise, the young adults correctly classified a higher percentage of all positive emotions [amusement = 91.18, tenderness = 95.59, total = 89.71] than the older adults [amusement = 38.46, tenderness = 28.21, total = 56.41]. The results show that the older adults’ responses were more varied as regards the number of emotions they identified for a particular target (see Fig. 1). Although both groups correctly identified each emotion, our results reveal differences in the level of identification. For the positive emotions, amusement was experienced more intensely by the young adults than the older adults [t(105) = 2.46, p = .015, d = 0.49]. In the case of negative emotions, fear was experienced more intensely by the younger adults than the older adults [t(105) = 2.87, p = .005, d = 0.58].

Figure 1

Young and older adults’ ratings of emotional targets and non-target response to the target films. ggplot graphs.

Full size image

Effect of the emotion induction and age

To analyze the effects of the emotion induction, age group, and age × emotion interaction, Table 1 shows the results separately organized for each of the six target emotions.

Table 1 Subjective and physiological emotion patterns differences in emotional targets between young and old adults.

Full size table

With respect to the effectiveness of the MIP (emotion factor), exposure to the six emotions generated significant changes in all the subjective and physiological variables, regardless of age group. Effect sizes range from a minimum of η2 = .03 to a maximum of η2 = .74, with most values being above η2 = .30 (large effect size). The greatest effects were found for the variables related to emotion identification evaluated on the DES.

Effect of negative emotion induction

The two-way ANOVA (neutral induction vs. anger induction × young adults vs. older adults; neutral induction vs. disgust induction × young adults vs. older adults; neutral induction vs. fear induction × young adults vs. older adults; neutral induction vs. sadness induction × young adults vs. older adults) shows a main effect of age group on the SCL variable: the young adults presented higher levels of skin conductance compared to the older adults. In the direction of HR pattern, we also found significant effects for the age group × emotion interaction, where the young adults (anger: [t(67) =  − 6.17, p ≤ .001, Cohen’s d = 0.47]; disgust: adults [t(67) =  − 7.98, p ≤ .001, Cohen’s d = 0.50]; fear: [t(67) =  − 10.08, p ≤ .001, Cohen’s d = 0.66]; sadness: [t(67) =  − 9.69, p ≤ .001, Cohen’s d = 0.51]) showed a greater increase in their response than the older adults (anger: [t(38) =  − 3.68, p ≤ .001, Cohen’s d = 0.35]; disgust: [t(38) =  − 3.79, p ≤ .001, Cohen’s d = 0.30]; fear: [t(38) =  − 3.19, p = .003, Cohen’s d = 0.28]; sadness: [t(38) =  − 4.29, p ≤ .001, Cohen’s d = 0.30]).

Respect to the subjective variables, we found significant effects for the age group × emotion interaction on anger, disgust and sadness targets, where the older adults (anger: [t(38) =  − 7.99, p ≤ .001, Cohen’s d = 1.73]; disgust: [t(38) =  − 6.21, p ≤ .001, Cohen’s d = 1.33]; sadness: [t(38) =  − 5.92, p ≤ .001, Cohen’s d = 1.22]) reported a greater increase in their subjective arousal than the young adults (anger: [t(67) =  − 6.41, p ≤ .001, Cohen’s d = 1.00]; disgust: [t(67) =  − 6.31, p ≤ .001, Cohen’s d = 0.89]; sadness: [t(67) =  − 4.01, p ≤ .001, Cohen’s d = 0.53]). However, we found a main effect of age on the subjective evaluation of fear arousal, which the young adults scored higher on subjective arousal than he older adults. With regard to valence, we found a significant effect of the age × emotion interaction on disgust and fear targets, where the older adults (disgust: [t(38) = 7.11, p ≤ .001, Cohen’s d = 1.80]; fear: [t(38) = 5.76, p ≤ .001, Cohen’s d = 1.34]) scoring lower on subjective valence compared to their younger counterparts (disgust: [t(67) = 6.55, p ≤ .001, Cohen’s d = 1.12] ; fear: [t(67) = 4.60, p ≤ .001, Cohen’s d = 0.79]). Finally, we found the age × emotion interaction on target emotion identification (DES), with older adults scoring lower on the identification of this emotion [t(38) =  − 4.92, p ≤ .001, Cohen’s d = 1.00] compared to the young adults [t(67) =  − 13.10, p ≤ .001, Cohen’s d = 1.87]. These findings suggest that despite physiological patterns (SCL and HR) being higher in the young adults, the older adults interpreted that their arousal was more intense. However, in the case of fear target, the older participants rated it higher on unpleasantness and found the target emotion more difficult to identify than the young adults. Accordingly, fear appears to have a greater subjective and physiological impact on the young adults. See Figs. 2, 3, 4 and 5.

Figure 2

Subjective and physiological response by target condition and age group. (A) Anger valence (SAM). (B) Anger arousal (SAM). (C) Anger emotion level (CED). (D) Anger skin conductance level. (E) Anger heart rate. ggplot graphs.

Full size image

Figure 3

Subjective and physiological response by target condition and age group. (A) Disgust valence (SAM). (B) Disgust arousal (SAM). (C) Disgust emotion level (CED). (D) Disgust skin conductance level. (E) Disgust heart rate. ggplot graphs.

Full size image

Figure 4

Subjective and physiological response by target condition and age group. (A) Fear valence (SAM). (B) Fear arousal (SAM). (C) Fear emotion level (CED). (D) Fear skin conductance level. (E) Fear heart rate. ggplot graphs.

Full size image

Figure 5

Subjective and physiological response by target condition and age group. Note: (A) Sadness valence (SAM). (B) Sadness arousal (SAM). (C) Sadness emotion level (CED). (D) Sadness skin conductance level. (E) Sadness heart rate. ggplot graphs.

Full size image

Effect of positive emotion induction

The two-way ANOVA (neutral induction vs. tenderness induction × young adults vs. older adults; neutral induction vs. amusement induction × young adults vs. older adults) showed a main effect of age on SCL, with the young adults exhibiting higher skin conductance than the older participants. We also found a significant effect of the emotion × age interaction on HR. In particular, the young group (t(67) =  − 7.70, p ≤ .001, Cohen’s d = 0.49) exhibited higher HR than the older group (t(38) =  − 3.83, p ≤ .001, Cohen’s d = 0.32) on tenderness target. In the case of amusement, the young adults’ HR increasing (t(67) =  − 9.18, p ≤ .001, Cohen’s d = 0.51), while the older adults showed no change in this variable (t(38) =  − 1.44, p = .156, Cohen’s d = 0.12).We also found significant effects of the age × emotion interaction on the subjective evaluation of arousal. The older adults [t(38) =  − 5.04, p ≤ .001, Cohen’s d = 0.92] scored higher on the subjective arousal scale compared to the young adults [t(67) =  − 2.84, p = .006, Cohen’s d = 0.45] on tenderness emotion. Respect to the amusement, we found a main effect of age on the variables of subjective arousal and target emotion identification (DES), indicating that the younger adults experienced higher levels of subjective arousal and identified the target emotions with greater intensity compared to their older counterparts. These findings suggest that, on the one hand, amusement emotion has a greater impact on young adults compared to older ones, at both a subjective and physiological level. On the other hand, the subjective arousal of tenderness has a greater impact on the older adults, although the autonomic response is greater in young adults. See Figs. 6 and 7.

Figure 6

Subjective and physiological response by target condition and age group. (A) Tenderness valence (SAM). (B) Tenderness arousal (SAM). (C) Tenderness emotion level (CED). (D) Tenderness skin conductance level. (E) Tenderness heart rate. ggplot graphs.

Full size image

Figure 7

Subjective and physiological response by target condition and age group. (A) Amusement valence (SAM). (B) Amusement arousal (SAM). (C) Amusement emotion level (CED). (D) Amusement skin conductance level. (E) Amusement heart rate. ggplot graphs.

Full size image

Discussion

Adopting a popular set of film clips28,31, the present study is the first to explore both subjective and autonomic emotional response in older people with this tool. Film clips generated significant changes at both subjective and physiological emotional levels in both age groups. For neutral clips, no significant differences being found in the subjective and physiological measures between young and older adults, except for the arousal. Consequently, the results suggest that the differences in negative and positive emotional responses were due to the MIP and not to the previous emotional state28,33.

Our findings confirmed that young and older adults present different patterns of response to negative stimuli. However, within each age group, similar responses were found across the different emotions. For example, the responses to the disgust and anger stimuli followed a similar pattern: young adults exhibited a more intense physiological level (SCL and HR) but the older adults reported greater arousal. Although both subjective and physiological arousal level increased in both age groups, the amplitude of this response was different. There are several possible explanations for this similarity in the response pattern to both emotions. First, anger may co-occur with disgust, possibly because participants perceive the content as morally (and not physically) disgusting34,35,36. This would mean a co-elicitation of emotions occurs. Second, the relevance of the stimuli might have a different effect in each age group, with older adults being more sensitive to situations of social injustice14,26,37. This would be the case, for example, for scenes of atrocities committed in the Second World War, which might simultaneously evoke repulsion and anger. Third, anger is the most difficult discrete emotion to induce through MIPs22. Regarding affective valence, older adults showed lower affective valence compared to young adults in disgust stimuli. Other studies have found no age-related differences in this self-reported emotion10. For sadness stimuli, we found that subjective arousal was higher in older adults, while the physiological response was more intense in young adults (SCL and HR). As with anger and disgust targets, these findings might be explained by the significance of the life experiences in the two age groups. In the case of older adults, it is typically thought they will have more likely experienced a personal loss10,13,18 and are more likely to have experienced situations similar to those portrayed in the film clips, with an example being when the content is particularly relevant for older adults such as warlike conflict11,28,38.

In contrast, the older participants showed lower levels of subjective emotional valence in the fear stimuli, while the young participants recorded higher heart rate levels. This physiological difference has been reported in previous studies using other MIPs39. On the other hand, the older adults identified this emotion significantly less on the DES than the younger ones. Some studies, however, have reported the opposite response40.

Concerning our exploration of positive emotions, we also found differences between subjective and physiological emotional systems. On the amusement clips, the younger adults presented higher levels on both parameters and showed coordinated changes across experiential and physiological arousal responses. These data are in contrast to the results on the induction of negative emotions. In addition, the young adults showed higher HR level and perceived the target emotion with higher intensity. This coherence between both systems has previously been observed in a population of young adults following emotion induction using clips eliciting amusement41. Also, our findings are consistent with previous research using film clips to study differences between young and older adults14,26 In line with the model of strength and vulnerability integration and previous studies suggesting increased positivity in older age, these data appear to provide greater support for the idea that the level of age-related affect depends more on the degree of arousal or activation required by each positive emotion than the emotional category itself. In this case, amusement is a high-arousal positive emotion, and previous studies have suggested the perceived intensity in older adults is lower in response to these types of emotions42. However, in the case of lower-arousal emotions, such as enjoyment or happiness, older adults show higher levels of well-being than their younger counterparts43,44,45.

Finally, we found that the tenderness response pattern differed from the amusement emotion. On the tenderness targets, the young participants scored higher on both physiological patterns (HR and SCL), yet their levels of experiential arousal were lower than those of their older counterparts. These findings are interesting as they show that positive emotions should not be included under a generic label of happiness, as has been commonly done in the previous literature28,31. To the best of our knowledge, no studies have previously focused on physiological tenderness in older adults. The present study reveals differences between young and older adults in the amplitude of the physiological response pattern and that these differences are reversed in the pattern of subjective responses. We take the current evidence as supporting prominent life span theories. These propose that differences may be due to changes in the way each age group experience the different stimuli and perceive them as more or less pleasant. Various factors may intervene in this process. First, the topics of the clips are key in emotional experience. For example, some of the clips used to elicit tenderness reflected situations of personal risk or social injustices10. Second is the relevance of the attachment-related emotions in different life stages, and third, the level of arousal of the different emotions. This is logical in the sense of attending to high-arousal stimuli when young and attending to low-arousal stimuli when older.

In sum, our findings reflect a complex and multiple system, not just a simple response to the affective film clips. Across the analysis of the target emotions, there is a predominant coherence between the different measures of the subjective system and those of the physiological system. However, this coherence is not present in the relation between the two systems. Components of the physiological response and of the subjective response appear to form part of the same emotional phenomenon, but are independent processes46. Indeed, the associations between the two systems are usually weaker than expected47,48. Thus, our findings suggest that the subjective response and the physiological response form part of a dual-process framework25.

With regard to the differences between young and older adults, if we had to speculate, we might attribute these differences to biological or psychological processes. The literature suggests that amygdala dysfunction and neural degradation may affect the interpretation of emotional stimuli. In fact, the aging brain model proposed by Cacioppo et al.49 suggests that lower amygdala activation triggers a dampened response to negative stimuli, primarily in the arousal parameter. Moreover, older adults’ autonomic levels are reduced in magnitude12,50. Thus, one would expect a dampened response to all negative emotions. Nevertheless, the current study reveals differences in the way each of these emotions is experienced, with fear being the only one that meets such expectations.

With regard to psychological processes, the differences between emotional targets may have various explanations. For example, the physiological emotional response has traditionally been measured during exposure to the mood-inducing stimulus, while the subjective has been assessed after exposure. Then, the subjective response involves cognitive interpretation after watching the clip. In other words, top-down processing (patterns of prefrontal and subcortical neural activity) would be triggered, which could enhance or impair the coherence between the two systems and involve the intervention of different emotion regulation processes25,51. At the same time, the motivations, priorities and limitations of each life stage seem to lead individuals to experience different emotions and to experience them with differing intensity. For example, the tendency of older adults to seek goals with a powerful emotional significance and respond more positively to low- or medium-arousal stimuli and more positively to high-arousal emotions7,52. In the same line, it has been suggested that the nature of emotional experience in older persons is more complex and mixed than in younger adults53,54.

In sum, the age-related differences in emotional reactivity appear to be the result of both changes in the organism and motivational changes. Human behavior is biologically rooted and individuals are flexible in response to challenges and expressions marked by our time. Thus, the relations among the different components of an emotion may follow a synchrony pathway or may situationally uncouple55.

As with all research, this work needs to be considered in the light of some limitations. The fact that part of our sample was older adults raises questions about physiological patterns. In this sense, the participants declared that they were taking no medications that might affect the study variables. Nonetheless, they might have been suffering from a hidden pathology, such as auricular fibrillation. Moreover, although multiple autonomic measures were included, an overall representation of the complex functioning of the autonomic nervous system was not achieved.

In future research, the number of measures should be increased, and the simultaneous recording of reactivity and physiological and subjective regulation should be implemented. The literature suggests that both the time and the mode of regulation after a negative emotion differ between young and older persons56,57.

In addition, as perceived time is strongly correlated with chronological age, changes in goals appear systematically as people move through adulthood7. Nonetheless, future studies should include the measure of socioemotional goals so as to enrich the substantiation of emotional differences between age groups.

As regards the stimuli used in this study, the set contains clips from films released at the end of the 1990s and the start of the twenty-first century, which might suggest a possible impact of generational differences on emotional reactivity. For example, the younger adults might have understood the aggressive style of humor in the amusement clips better than the older adults58. In this sense, one of the most common limitations of MIPs is that the stimuli do not elicit only a single emotion. In our work, however, the participants reacted appropriately to the targeted stimuli. Finally, another line of research in relation to the specificity of emotions could be to expand the repertoire of positive emotions in MIPs. Emotions such as tenderness, love or compassion may play a significant role in older adults’ response and emotion regulation.

Conclusions

This study shows that film clips are an effective tool for eliciting positive and negative emotions in young and older adults. The results support the importance of including physiological emotional variables in studies with older adults and shows that both age groups exhibit different subjective and physiological responses, which are consistent with the idea of decreased biological activation across adulthood. It also demonstrates that the dimensional and discrete models of emotion are complementary and both provide valuable information on the complex emotional system. In this sense, it is important to make advances in the study of how physiological changes in emotional experience may respond to developmental functions that depend on age. Finally, our study furnishes new data on attachment-related emotions in aging and how changes in emotional response are associated with the key motivations of each life stage. It is essential to consider this in order to expand our knowledge of the mechanisms of emotion regulation in older adults and to continue working to enhance their quality of life.

Method

Participants

An a priori analysis of the sample required was conducted using G*Power (Version 3.1.9.4.). For an effect size of F = 0.17 equivalent to η2 = .15, taken from the work by Fernández-Aguilar et al. (2018), 0.05 probability of error, 2 groups and 5 measures, the necessary sample size was 66 (33 per age group). We decided to form a sample of 40 per group. Finally, the older adult group comprised 39 participants and the younger group comprised 68, due to the greater availability of volunteers of that age group. The difference in the number of participants per group was taken into account in the variance analysis using robust indicators.

Sixty-eight younger college students (M = 18.78, SD = 1.71, 69.1% women) and 39 older adults (M = 68.51, SD = 6.66, 66.7% women) participated in this study. Participants were divided into age groups to form a younger group ranging in age from 18 to 27 and an older group ranging in age from 60 to 84 years. The mean number of years spent in education was 12.71 (0.83) for the younger group and 13.33 (3.08) for the older group [t(105) =  − 1.58, p = .116, d = 0.27]. They were receiving no psychotropic or drug treatment and had no previous history of psychological, psychiatric or neurological disorder, according to the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-V) American Psychiatric Association59. None of the participants was taking any cardiovascular disease or medical treatment that could affect the results of the task or presented no auditory or visual impairments other than requiring corrective lenses. All were of Caucasian ethnicity and native Spanish speakers. There were no between-group differences in the variables of gender, educational level and mood state prior to the experiment. The participants were recruited from a research volunteer pool at the Department of Psychology at the University of Castilla- La Mancha (UCLM) Medical School, from an association at the Universidad de Mayores (a university program for older adults) and two socio-cultural centers in the city of Albacete. The younger adults were all students of courses in psychology at UCLM medical school.

Measures

Before the experimental session, we administered two questionnaires. The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)60 was administered to assess cognitive impairment. The MMSE is a screening tool used to measure decline in cognitive abilities such as alterations in memory, where scores of 27 or lower are considered cognitive impairment. No participant was excluded from our study for this reason (M = 29.18; SD = 0.95). Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II)61 was also administered. The BDI-II is a self-report questionnaire that assesses symptoms of depression such as anhedonia and sadness. Scores between 10 and 15 are considered to be in a dysphoric range and scores of 16 or above represent a depressed range62. The mean scores were 9.25 (5.10) for younger participants and 7.72 (4.59) for older participants [t(105) = 1.54, p = .124, d = 0.31].

During the session, the subjective emotional response was assessed using dimensional and discrete measures. The Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM)63 is a self-report questionnaire that assesses emotional response, measuring affective valence, arousal and dominance. Considering the dimensional structure of affect30, we administered the items measuring valence and arousal. These two dimensions are those most commonly used in the literature and permit comparison with somato-physiological measures. Thus, participants rated, on a 9-point Likert-type scale, how pleasant (9) or unpleasant (1) and how aroused (9) or relaxed (1) they felt while watching the emotional video clips. The questionnaire uses graphic figures which represent the different emotional states and is therefore rapid and simple to administer in both age groups, regardless of participants’ educational level. The Differential Emotions Scale (DES)64,65 was used to assess discrete emotions. This emotional scale has 18 items and uses a 7-point scale (1 = ‘‘not at all’’, 7 = ‘‘very intense’’) to rate the extent to which participants feel each state as they are watching a film clip. The emotional categories used in this study are amusement, anger, disgust, fear, tenderness/love and sadness.

The physiological emotional response was assessed using cardiovascular and electrodermal activity variables. They were measured through blood volume pressure (BVP) and skin conductance (SC), respectively. A novel acquisition system based on an unobtrusive wearable monitoring device and related control software was used to record the signals66,67. BVP was estimated using a photoplethysmography (PPG) technique, where a photo-emitter and receiver sensor was in charge of detecting the blood volume fluctuation occurring during the cardiac cycle. Alternations of the BVP waveform are highly correlated with heart ventricular depolarization and repolarization, thus being suitable to measure heart rhythm68. The PPG sensor was placed on the index fingertip of the non-dominant hand. The SC signal was acquired by means of a direct current exosomatic technique, using a pair of Ag/AgCl disc electrodes with contact diameters of 10 mm. The electrodes were attached to the middle phalanges on the palmar side of the index and middle fingers. A single-supply, rail-to-rail input/output, instrumental operational amplifier was used to implement a voltage-controlled linear current source. This current is limited to 10 µA/cm2 to avoid damage to the sweat gland ducts and to prevent nonlinearities in the current–voltage measurement.

Once data was acquired, BVP and SC signals were processed to reduce noise inherent to the system and to retain useful information. BVP was recorded at a sampling rate of 60 Hz and a 22-bit resolution to perform correct signal acquisition without distortion69. Some external causes may severely affect the quality of the BVP signal, such as poor contact of the photo-sensor on the skin, surrounding electrical sources, ambient lights, or changes in temperature, among others. To reduce their negative effect, different filters were applied to the BVP signal. Concretely, baseline drift was removed by carrying out a 0.5 Hz cut-off-high-pass, linear phase finite impulse response (FIR) filter. Then, a 30 Hz cut-off low-pass, linear-phase FIR filter was utilized to eliminate high-frequency noise and power-line interferences. Additionally, peaks related to pulse pumping were located on BVP signals using a robust and reliable peak detection algorithm, capable of dealing with movement artifacts and signal morphologies70. Finally, inter-beat intervals (IBIs) were derived from the peak-data series.

Similarly, SC raw data was acquired at a sampling frequency of 10 Hz and 12-bit resolution. These specifications were selected with the aim of preventing distortions and leaving the SC waveform unaltered71. SC morphology is the result of two independent components: a fast-changing skin conductance response (SCR), overlapped with a slowly-changing skin conductance level component (SCL). The SCL component ranges from 0 to 0.05 Hz, whilst SCR ranges from 0.05 to 1.5 Hz. Therefore, each SC signal was filtered by applying a 1.5 Hz cut-off low-pass FIR filter to decrease noise generated during the acquisition.

Regarding heart rhythm, the IBI data series were first divided by sixty to obtain the heart rate (HR) measured in beats per minute (BPM). Then, the HR metric was partitioned into five- second equally-separated segments. Finally, the mean of the HR was stored and used subsequently in a statistical analysis. A similar procedure was carried out with the SC processed series. The data series were first divided into equal segments lasting five seconds and the mean of each segment was recorded for subsequent analysis. This methodology is similar to that used by other authors21,23.

Mood induction procedure

We selected fifty-four excerpts from high-definition clips previously validated in a sample of young Spanish adults72. The selected scenes maintained the same features used in similar studies31. We selected film clips to elicit seven target emotions: sadness, disgust, fear, anger, amusement, tenderness and neutral. The duration of the experiment was approximately one hour, being administered using E-prime 2 Professional (Psychology Software Tools, Inc.). Following the recommendations of previous studies22, the experiment was conducted in a room with dimmed lighting on a 27″ computer screen situated in a laboratory (8 m2).

In the session, participants started by watching a neutral clip to establish the baseline of the physiological parameters. Each participant watched a set of 9 film clips including 6 emotional targets in a counterbalanced order (sadness, disgust, fear, anger, amusement and tenderness)28. They were also required to complete a distraction task to prevent excitation transfer from one emotion to another. The distraction task consisted of distinguishing geometric figures on the screen. At the end of the session, another neutral clip was presented to recover to a relaxed state.

Data analysis

For each participant, there were three sets of variables: a two-factor subjective evaluation (SAM: valence and arousal, and DES: six discrete emotions) and autonomic response patterns (SCL and HR). The subjective responses were evaluated immediately after each showing of the film clips and the physiological responses were measured on a continuous basis as the experiment was conducted. Furthermore, in order to measure the actual strength of the mood induction for each of the target emotions, the same measures were taken for the initial neutral film clip. For the subjective responses, we considered the mean scores on the SAM and the DES for the neutral stimulus and compared them with those obtained for the emotional stimuli. For the physiological responses, we calculated the mean SCL and HR scores for the neutral clip and compared them with the maximum scores obtained from the emotional stimuli. The statistical analyses were conducted using STATA 15.173, R software (v.3.6.3)74 and ggplot2 (v.3.3.0)75 for data visualisation.

Previously, we analyzed the possible differences between the groups (young adults vs. older adults) in the responses to the neutral stimulus in order to evaluate any differences in the baseline state. Independent t tests were conducted on each of the emotional variables under study (SAM, DES, SCL y HR) and the effect size of the differences was calculated using Cohen’s d test.

To study the age-related differences in identifying each emotional target, we tested it by independent t tests. The effect size was also calculated Cohen’s d test. To study the ability to identify the target emotions, we ran a discriminant analysis. First, we transformed the direct scores on the DES for each target, assigning a value of 1 to the maximum score and 0 for all other scores). In the case of two or more responses with the maximum score, we assigned a value of 1 to them all. We then performed a 6 × 6 response matrix for the DES and then the discriminant analysis (emotion by emotion; total) to study the degree to which the responses to an emotion or a set of emotions serve to discriminate between the two age groups.

To determine whether the older adults’ physiological and subjective emotional patterns differed from those of their younger counterparts, we ran mixed-design two-way repeated measures ANOVAs. As within-subject variables, we used the neutral film clip measure and that of the corresponding target emotion. As the between-subjects variable, we used the age group (young vs. older adults). We conducted an ANOVA for each target emotion, calculating the valence, arousal, discrete emotion, SCL and HR in younger and older adults. We calculated the effect of the emotion induction (within-subjects), considering the neutral stimulus and the emotional stimuli, the age effect (between-subjects), and the effect of the emotion × age interaction.

Power analysis

G*Power (version 3.1.9.4) was used to calculate the power of the sample. With the calculation of the F test and ANOVA for repeated measures, within-between interaction, taking an effect size value of 0.50 obtained from the work by Fernandez-Aguilar et al.28, an α value of 0.05, with n = 107, divided in two groups, and thirty measure variables (5 measures × 6 target emotions), we obtained a power of 1.00 (1 − β err prob), critical F = 1.47, numerator df = 29.0, denominator df = 3,045, and noncentrality parameter λ = 577.8.

Ethical statement

All participants signed the informed consent prior to the study, according to the requirements of the approved ethics procedure of the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Albacete University Hospital and with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Data availability

The datasets analyzed within the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

1. Scheibe, S. & Carstensen, L. L. Emotional aging: recent findings and future trends. J. Gerontol. Ser. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 65B, 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbp132 (2010).

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Mather, M. The affective neuroscience of aging. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 67, 213–238. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033540 (2016).

   Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

3. Carstensen, L. L. Evidence for a life-span theory of socioemotional selectivity. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 4, 151–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep11512261 (1995).

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Charles, S. T. & Luong, G. Emotional experience across adulthood. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 22, 443–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413497013 (2013).

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Piazza, J. R., Charles, S. T., Stawski, R. S. & Almeida, D. M. Age and the association between negative affective states and diurnal cortisol. Psychol. Aging 28, 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029983 (2013).

   Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

6. Mather, M. & Carstensen, L. L. Aging and motivated cognition: the positivity effect in attention and memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 496–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.005 (2005).

   Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

7. Carstensen, L. L. & DeLiema, M. The positivity effect: a negativity bias in youth fades with age. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 19, 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.07.009 (2018).

   Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

8. Schweizer, S. et al. Age-related decline in positive emotional reactivity and emotion regulation in a population-derived cohort. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/2eypg (2018).

9. Streubel, B. & Kunzmann, U. Age differences in emotional reactions: arousal and age-relevance count. Psychol. Aging 26, 966–978. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023424 (2011).

   Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

10. Seider, B. H., Shiota, M. N., Whalen, P. & Levenson, R. W. Greater sadness reactivity in late life. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 6, 186–194. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq069 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

11. Kunzmann, U. & Gruhn, D. Age differences in emotional reactivity: the sample case of sadness. Psychol. Aging 20, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.20.1.47 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

12. Uchino, B. N., Birmingham, W. & Berg, C. A. Are older adults less or more physiologically reactive? A meta-analysis of age-related differences in cardiovascular reactivity to laboratory tasks. J. Gerontol. Ser. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 65, 154–162. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbp127 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Tsai, J. L., Levenson, R. W. & Carstensen, L. L. Autonomic, subjective, and expressive responses to emotional films in older and younger Chinese Americans and European Americans. Psychol. Aging 15, 684–693 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

14. Beaudreau, S. A., MacKay, A. & Storandt, M. Older adults’ responses to emotional stimuli: a cautionary note. Exp. Aging Res. 35, 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610730902720513 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

15. Sheppes, G. Emotion regulation choice: theory. In Handbook of Emotion Regulation (ed Gross, J. J.) 126–139 (Guilford, New York, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

16. Kunzmann, U. & Richter, D. Emotional reactivity across the adult life span: the cognitive pragmatics make a difference. Psychol. Aging 24, 879–889. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017347 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

17. Korpal, P. & Jankowiak, K. Physiological and self-report measures in emotion studies: methodological considerations. Pol. Psychol. Bull. 49, 475–481. https://doi.org/10.24425/124345 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Kunzmann, U., Rohr, M., Wieck, C., Kappes, C. & Wrosch, C. Speaking about feelings: further evidence for multidirectional age differences in anger and sadness. Psychol. Aging 32, 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000142 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

19. Harmon-Jones, E., Harmon-Jones, C. & Summerell, E. On the importance of both dimensional and discrete models of emotion. Behav. Sci https://doi.org/10.3390/bs7040066 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

20. Gruber, J., Mennin, D. S., Fields, A., Purcell, A. & Murray, G. Heart rate variability as a potential indicator of positive valence system disturbance: a proof of concept investigation. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 98, 240–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.08.005 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

21. McGinley, J. J. & Friedman, B. H. Autonomic specificity in emotion: the induction method matters. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 118, 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.06.002 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

22. Rottenberg, J., Ray, R. D. & Gross, J. J. Emotion elicitation using films. In Handbook of Emotion Elicitation and Assessment Series in Affective Science. (ed. Coan, J. A. & Allen, J. J. B.) 9–28 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

23. Stephens, C. L., Christie, I. C. & Friedman, B. H. Autonomic specificity of basic emotions: evidence from pattern classification and cluster analysis. Biol. Psychol. 84, 463–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.03.014 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

24. Gross, J. J. & Levenson, R. W. Emotion elicitation using films. Cogn. Emot. 9, 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939508408966 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. Evers, C. et al. Emotion response coherence: a dual-process perspective. Biol. Psychol. 98, 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.11.003 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

26. Fajula, C., Bonin-Guillaume, S., Jouve, E. & Blin, O. Emotional reactivity assessment of healthy elderly with an emotion-induction procedure. Exp. Aging Res. 39, 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2013.741961 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

27. Chou, K.-L., Lee, T. M. C. & Ho, A. H. Y. Does mood state change risk taking tendency in older adults?. Psychol. Aging 22, 310–318. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.22.2.310 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

28. Fernández-Aguilar, L., Ricarte, J., Ros, L. & Latorre, J. M. Emotional differences in young and older adults: films as mood induction procedure. Front. Psychol. 9, 1110–1110. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01110 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

29. Rosenberg, E. L. & Ekman, P. Coherence between expressive and experiential systems in emotion. Cogn. Emot. 8, 201–229 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

30. Russell, A. A circumplex model of affect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 39, 1161–1178. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077714 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

31. Schaefer, A., Nils, F., Sanchez, X. & Philippot, P. Assessing the effectiveness of a large database of emotion-eliciting films: a new tool for emotion researchers. Cogn. Emot. 24, 1153–1172. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930903274322 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

32. Shiota, M. N., Neufeld, S. L., Yeung, W. H., Moser, S. E. & Perea, E. F. Feeling good: autonomic nervous system responding in five positive emotions. Emotion 11, 1368–1378. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024278 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

33. Hewig, J. et al. A revised film set for the induction of basic emotions. Cogn. Emot. 19, 1095–1109. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930541000084 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

34. Whitton, A. E., Henry, J. D., Rendell, P. G. & Grisham, J. R. Disgust, but not anger provocation, enhances levator labii superioris activity during exposure to moral transgressions. Biol. Psychol. 96, 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.11.012 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

35. Gilman, T. L. et al. A film set for the elicitation of emotion in research: a comprehensive catalog derived from four decades of investigation. Behav. Res. Methods 49, 2061–2082. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0842-x (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

36. Salerno, J. M. & Peter-Hagene, L. C. The interactive effect of anger and disgust on moral outrage and judgments. Psychol. Sci. 24, 2069–2078. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613486988 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

37. Charles, S. T. Viewing injustice: greater emotion heterogeneity with age. Psychol. Aging 20, 159–164. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.20.1.159 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

38. Kliegel, M., Jäger, T. & Phillips, L. H. Emotional development across adulthood: differential age-related emotional reactivity and emotion regulation in a negative mood induction procedure. Int. J. Aging Hum. Dev. 64, 217–244. https://doi.org/10.2190/U48Q-0063-3318-1175 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

39. Labouvie-Vief, G., Lumley, M. A., Jain, E. & Heinze, H. Age and gender differences in cardiac reactivity and subjective emotion responses to emotional autobiographical memories. Emotion 3, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.3.2.115 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

40. Jenkins, L. M. & Andrewes, D. G. A new set of standardised verbal and nonverbal contemporary film stimuli for the elicitation of emotions. Brain Impair. 13, 212–227. https://doi.org/10.1017/BrImp.2012.18 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

41. Mauss, I. B., Levenson, R. W., McCarter, L., Wilhelm, F. H. & Gross, J. J. The tie that binds? Coherence among emotion experience, behavior, and physiology. Emotion 5, 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.5.2.175 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

42. Charles, S. T. & Piazza, J. R. Memories of social interactions: age differences in emotional intensity. Psychol. Aging 22, 300–309. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.22.2.300 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

43. Ferrari, V., Bruno, N., Chattat, R. & Codispoti, M. Evaluative ratings and attention across the life span: emotional arousal and gender. Cogn. Emot. 31, 552–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1140020 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

44. Pinquart, M. Correlates of subjective health in older adults: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Aging 16, 414–426. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.16.3.414 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

45. Stone, A. A., Schwartz, J. E., Broderick, J. E. & Deaton, A. A snapshot of the age distribution of psychological well-being in the United States. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 9985–9990. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1003744107 (2010).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

46. Strack, F. & Deutsch, R. Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 8, 220–247. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

47. Bonanno, G. A. & Keltner, D. The coherence of emotion systems: comparing “on-line” measures of appraisal and facial expressions, and self-report. Cogn. Emot. 18, 431–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930341000149 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

48. Barrett, L. F. Are emotions natural kinds?. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 1, 28–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00003.x (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

49. Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., Bechara, A., Tranel, D. & Hawkley, L. C. Could an aging brain contribute to subjective well-being?: The value added by a social neuroscience perspective. In Social Neuroscience: Toward Understanding the Underpinnings of the Social Mind (eds. Todorov, S., Fiske, T. & Prentice, D. A.) 249–262 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2011).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

50. Levenson, R. W. In Psychology and the Aging Revolution: How We Adapt to Longer Life. (eds. Qualls, S. H. & Abeles, N.) 123–140 (American Psychological Association, Washington, 2000).

51. Scheibe, S. & Sheppes, G. Distract or reappraise? Age-related differences in emotion-regulation choice. Emotion 15, 677–681. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039246 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

52. Labouvie-Vief, G. Dynamic integration. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 12, 201–206. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0963-7214.2003.01262.x (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

53. Larsen, J. T., Hershfield, H. E., Stastny, B. J. & Hester, N. On the relationship between positive and negative affect: their correlation and their co-occurrence. Emotion 17, 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000231 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

54. Ready, R. E., Carvalho, J. O. & Weinberger, M. I. Emotional complexity in younger, midlife, and older adults. Psychol. Aging 23, 928–933. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014003 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

55. Friedman, B. H., Stephens, C. L. & Thayer, J. F. Redundancy analysis of autonomic and self-reported, responses to induced emotions. Biol. Psychol. 98, 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.12.006 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

56. Scheibe, S., Sheppes, G. & Staudinger, U. M. Distract or reappraise? Age-related differences in emotion-regulation choice. Emotion 15, 677–681 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

57. Larcom, M. J. & Isaacowitz, D. M. Rapid emotion regulation after mood induction: age and individual differences. J. Gerontol. Ser. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci 64B, 733–741. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbp077 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

58. Stanley, J. T., Lohani, M. & Isaacowitz, D. M. Age-related differences in judgments of inappropriate behavior are related to humor style preferences. Psychol. Aging 29, 528–541. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036666 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

59. American, A. P. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5ª edn (Editorial Médica Panamericana, Villanueva de la Cañada, 2014).

60. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E. & McHugh, P. R. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J. Psychiatr. Res. 12, 189–198 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

61. Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J. & Erbaugh, J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 4, 561–571 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

62. Kendall, P. C., Hollon, S. D., Beck, A. T., Hammen, C. & Ingram, R. E. Issues and recommendations regarding use of the Beck Depression Inventory. Cogn. Ther. Res. 11, 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01186280 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

63. Bradley, M. M. & Lang, P. J. Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 25, 49–59 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

64. Izard, C. E., Dougherty, F. E., Bloxom, B. M. & Kotsch, N. E. The Differential Emotions Scale: A Method of Measuring the Meaning of Subjective Experience of Discrete Emotions (Vanderbilt University, Department of Psychology, Nashville, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

65. McHugo, G. J., Smith, C. A. & Lanzetta, J. T. The structure of self-reports of emotional responses to film segments. Motiv. Emot. 6, 365–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998191 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

66. Zangróniz, R., Martínez-Rodrigo, A., Pastor, J. M., López, M. T. & Fernández-Caballero, A. Electrodermal activity sensor for classification of calm/distress condition. Sensors 17, 2324 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

67. Zangróniz, R., Martínez-Rodrigo, A., López, M. T., Pastor, J. M. & Fernández-Caballero, A. Estimation of mental distress from photoplethysmography. Appl. Sci. 8, 69 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

68. Malik, M. Heart rate variability. Ann. Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 1, 151–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-474X.1996.tb00275.x (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

69. Nitzan, M., Babchenko, A. & Khanokh, B. Verylow frequency variability in arterial blood pressure and blood volume pulse. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 37, 54–58 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

70. Martinez-Rodrigo, A., Alcaraz, R. & Rieta, J. J. Application of the phasor transform for automatic delineation of single-lead ECG fiducial points. Physiol. Meas. 31, 1467–1485. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/31/11/005 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

71. Boucsein, W. Electrodermal Activity (Springer Science & Business Media, New York, NY, 2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1126-0.

    Book  Google Scholar 

72. Fernández, C., Mateos, J. C., Ribaudi, J. & Fernández-Abascal, E. Spanish validation of an emotion-eliciting set of films. Psicothema 23, 778–785 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

73. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 15 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, 2017).

74. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2018).

    Google Scholar 

75. Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer, New York, 2016).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was partially supported by the Spanish Ministry of the Economy and Competitiveness/European Regional Development Fund under TIN2015-72931- EXP and DPI2016-80894-R grants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

1. Department of Psychology, University of Castilla La Mancha, Albacete, Spain

   Luz Fernández-Aguilar, José M. Latorre, Laura Ros & Jorge J. Ricarte

2. Department of Informatic Systems, University of Castilla La Mancha, Albacete, Spain

   Arturo Martínez-Rodrigo & Antonio Fernández-Caballero

3. Department of Medical Sciences, University of Castilla La Mancha, Albacete, Spain

   José V. Moncho-Bogani

4. Institute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain

   Pablo Latorre

5. Departament of Ciències Experimentals I de La Salut, Cell Signaling Research Group, Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain

   Pablo Latorre

6. Neurological Disabilities Research Institute (IDINE), Albacete, Spain

   Luz Fernández-Aguilar, José M. Latorre, José V. Moncho-Bogani, Laura Ros & Jorge J. Ricarte

Authors

1. Luz Fernández-Aguilar

   View author publications

   You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

2. José M. Latorre

   View author publications

   You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

3. Arturo Martínez-Rodrigo

   View author publications

   You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

4. José V. Moncho-Bogani

   View author publications

   You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

5. Laura Ros

   View author publications

   You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

6. Pablo Latorre

   View author publications

   You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

7. Jorge J. Ricarte

   View author publications

   You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

8. Antonio Fernández-Caballero

   View author publications

   You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.L., A.F. and J.M. designed the study. L.F., J.L. and A.C. designed the experiment. L.F. and A.R. collected the data. J.L., J.R., L.R. and P.L. analyzed the data. P.L. and J.L. prepared the figures. L.F., J.L. and A.R. wrote the draft manuscript. All authors revised the draft and supervise changes.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Luz Fernández-Aguilar or José M. Latorre.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fernández-Aguilar, L., Latorre, J.M., Martínez-Rodrigo, A. et al. Differences between young and older adults in physiological and subjective responses to emotion induction using films. Sci Rep 10, 14548 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71430-y

Download citation

• Received: 21 November 2019

• Accepted: 13 August 2020

• Published: 03 September 2020

• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71430-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Copy to clipboard

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

How does self

What is self

What is self