So sánh kirin 659 vs snapdragon 636 năm 2024

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (with Adreno 506 graphics) and HiSilicon Kirin 659 (Mali-T830 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators

CPU Performance

Single and multi-core processor tests

Gaming Performance

GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan

Battery life

Efficiency of battery consumption

NanoReview Score

Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip

Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 625

  • Performs 2.2x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 51%) AnTuTu 10 score – 156K vs 103K
  • Has a smaller size transistor (14 versus 16 nm)

Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 659

  • Higher GPU frequency (~38%)
  • Announced 11-months later
  • 18% higher CPU clock speed (2360 vs 2000 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 10

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios

CPU 60796 46276 GPU 16056 7090 Memory 39758 17518 UX 39521 32873 Total score 156342 103807

Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance

Asset compression 62.9 MB/sec 62.5 MB/sec HTML 5 Browser 27.2 pages/sec 27.2 pages/sec PDF Renderer 27.4 Mpixels/sec 39 Mpixels/sec Image detection 9.55 images/sec 10 images/sec HDR 26.5 Mpixels/sec 26.1 Mpixels/sec Background blur 1.19 images/sec 0.84 images/sec Photo processing 6.81 images/sec 6.86 images/sec Ray tracing 1.67 Mpixels/sec 1.71 Mpixels/sec

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)

3DMark Wild Life Performance

Graphics test 1 FPS - Score 159 -

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 625 and Kirin 659

CPU

Architecture 8x 2 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 Cores 8 8 Frequency 2000 MHz 2360 MHz Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8-A Process 14 nanometers 16 nanometers Transistor count 2 billion 4 billion TDP 5 W - Manufacturing Samsung -

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 506 Mali-T830 MP2 Architecture Adreno 500 Midgard 4th gen GPU frequency 650 MHz 900 MHz Execution units 1 2 Shading units 96 16 Total shaders 96 32 FLOPS 124.8 Gigaflops 57.6 Gigaflops Vulkan version 1.0 1.0 OpenCL version 2.0 1.2 DirectX version 11 -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR3 LPDDR3 Memory frequency 933 MHz 933 MHz Bus 1x 32 Bit 2x 32 Bit Max bandwidth 7.46 Gbit/s - Max size 8 GB 4 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 546 No Storage type eMMC 5.1 eMMC 5.1 Max display resolution 1900 x 1200 1920 x 1200 Max camera resolution 1x 24MP, 2x 13MP 1x 16MP, 2x 8MP Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 60FPS Video playback 4K at 30FPS 1080p at 60FPS Video codecs H.264, H.265 H.264, H.265 Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

Modem X9 - 4G support LTE Cat. 7 LTE Cat. 7 5G support No No Download speed Up to 300 Mbps Up to 300 Mbps Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 50 Mbps Wi-Fi 5 4 Bluetooth 4.1 4.2 Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?

Snapdragon 625

150 (42.5%)

Total votes: 353

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 659 and Snapdragon 625, or ask any questions