Which refers to the capability to think abstractly comprehend complex ideas?

Cognitive ability is the biggest predictor of job performance. Cognitive ability is defined as a “mental capability that involves the ability to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, comprehend complex ideas, learn quickly and learn from.https://t.co/f4E5djlN5k

— IPCconsultants (@ipcconsultants) May 25, 2022

Intelligence is the ability to think rationally, learn effectively, understand complex ideas, and adapt to the environment. Accordingly, intelligence is best seen as a general ability that can influence performance on a wide range of cognitive tasks. IQ (the intelligence quotient) is the quantification of an individual’s intelligence relative to peers of a similar age. IQ is one of the most heritable psychological traits, and an individual’s score on a modern IQ test is a good predictor of many life outcomes, including educational and career success, health, longevity, and even happiness (Gottfredson 1998). Like humans, several species of animals express a “general cognitive ability” that influences performance on broad and diverse cognitive tasks, and moreover, animals exhibit a wide range of individual variations in this ability.

Intelligence and Intelligence Testing (IQ) in Humans

It has long been recognized that intelligence varies across individuals. Colloquially, we...

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Which refers to the capability to think abstractly comprehend complex ideas?

References

  • Banerjee, K., Chabris, C. F., Johnson, V. E., Lee, J. J., Tsao, F., & Hauser, M. D. (2009). General intelligence in another primate: Individual differences across cognitive task performance in a new world monkey (Saguinus oedipus). PloS One, 4(6), e5883.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Burkart, J. M., Schubiger, M. N., & van Schaik, C. P. (2016). The evolution of general intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–65. doi:10.1017/S0140525X16000959.

  • Carey, S., & Bartlett, E. (1978). Acquiring a single new word. Proceedings of the Stanford Child Language Conference, 15, 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Deary, I. J. (2014). The stability of intelligence from childhood to old age. Psychological Science, 23, 239–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 19–23. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00160.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Galsworthy, M. J., Paya-Cano, J. L., Monleón, S., & Plomin, R. (2002). Evidence for general cognitive ability (g) in heterogeneous stock mice and an analysis of potential confounds. Genes, Brain, & Behavior, 1(2), 88–95.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, L. S. (1998). The general intelligence factor. Scientific American Presents, 9, 24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Jonides, J., & Perrig, W. J. (2008). Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Proceedings National Academy of Sciences U.S.A, 105(19), 6829–6833.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, R. E., & Haier, R. J. (2007). The Parieto-frontal integration theory (P-FIT) of intelligence: Converging neuroimaging evidence. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30(2), 135–154.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kolata, S., Light, K., & Matzel, L. D. (2008). Domain-specific and domain-general learning factors are expressed in genetically heterogeneous CD-1 mice. Intelligence, 36, 619–629.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Konecky, R. O., Smith, M. A., & Olson, C. R. (2017). Monkey prefrontal neurons during sternberg task performance: Full contents of working memory or most recent item? Journal of Neurophysiology. doi:10.1152/jn.00541.2016. pii 00541 02016.

  • Light, K., Kolata, S., Wass, C., Denman-Brice, A., Zagalsky, R., & Matzel, L. D. (2010). Working memory training promotes general cognitive abilities in genetically heterogeneous mice. Current Biology, 20, 777–782.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mackintosh, N. J. (1998). IQ and human intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard Jr, T. J., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., ⋯ & Urbina, S. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51(2), 77–101. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.2.77.

  • Pilley, J. W., & Reid, A. K. (2011). Border collie comprehends object names as verbal referents. Behavioural Processes, 86(2), 184–195.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J. C., Raven, J. E., & Court, J. H. (1998). Progressive matrices. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redick, T. S., Shipstead, Z., Harrison, T. L., Hicks, K. L., Fried, D. E., Hambrick, D. Z., ⋯ & Engle, R. W. (2012). No evidence of intelligence improvement after working memory training: A randomized, placebo-controlled study. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 142, 359–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, M. R., & Constantinidis, C. (2015). Role of prefrontal persistent activity in working memory. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 9, 181. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2015.00181.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shipstead, Z., Redick, T. S., & Engle, R. W. (2012). Is working memory training effective? Psychological Bulletin, 138(4), 628–654.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, D. J., Boot, W. R., Charness, N., Gathercole, S. E., Chabris, C. F., Hambrick, D. Z., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2016). Do “brain-training” programs work? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17(3), 103–186. doi:10.1177/1529100616661983.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. (1904). General intelligence, objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–293.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Human Intelligence: The Model Is the Message. Science, 230(4730), 1111–1118.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal intelligence: experimental studies. New York: Macmillan.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L. (1935). Organization of behavior in the albino rat. Psychological Monographs, 17, 1–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, E. C. (1924). The inheritance of maze-learning ability in rats. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 4(1), 1–18. doi:10.1037/h0071979.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M., & Kaminski, J. (2004). Like infant, like dog. Science, 325, 1213–1214.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tryon, R. C. (1940). Genetic differences in maze-learning abilities in rats. Yearbook of the National Society for Studies in Education, 39, 111–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wass, C., Denman-Brice, A., Rios, C., Light, K. R., Kolata, S., Smith, A. M., & Matzel, L. D. (2012). Covariation of learning and “reasoning” abilities in mice: Evolutionary conservation of the operations of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Process, 38(2), 109–124.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wass, C., Pizzo, A., Sauce, B., Kawasumi, Y., Sturzoiu, T., Ree, F., ⋯ & Matzel, L. D. (2013). Dopamine D1 sensitivity in the prefrontal cortex predicts general cognitive abilities and is modulated by working memory training. Learning and Memory, 20(11), 617–627.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA

    Louis D. Matzel & Bruno Sauce

Authors

  1. Louis D. Matzel

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bruno Sauce

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louis D. Matzel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Oakland University , Rochester, Michigan, USA

    Jennifer Vonk

  2. Department of Psychology, Oakland University Department of Psychology, Rochester, Michigan, USA

    Ph.D. Todd Shackelford

Section Editor information

  1. Southern Oregon University, Ashland, OR, USA

    Mark A. Krause

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Matzel, L.D., Sauce, B. (2017). IQ. In: Vonk, J., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1080-1

Which of the following is an example of an abstract complex concept?

Personality is a complex, abstract concept that refers to characteristic patterns of thinking, feeling, and behaving including motivations, emotions, beliefs, and typical approaches to interacting with others.

Is a general mental capability that involves the ability?

Cognitive ability is defined as a general mental capability involving reasoning, problem solving, planning, abstract thinking, complex idea comprehension, and learning from experience (Gottfredson, 1997).

What is the way in which information is processed and manipulated in remembering thinking and knowing?

Cognition. The way in which information is processed and manipulated in remembering, thinking, and knowing. Artificial Intelligence (AI) A scientific field that focuses on creating machines capable of performing activities that require intelligence when that are done by people.

What is the ability to know something quickly and automatically?

Intuition is the ability to acquire knowledge without recourse to conscious reasoning.