What is a likely explanation for the results from cross sectional studies showing
Published on May 8, 2020 by Lauren Thomas. Revised on July 21, 2022. A cross-sectional study is a type of research design in which you collect data from many different individuals at
a single point in time. In cross-sectional research, you observe variables without influencing them. Researchers in economics, psychology, medicine, epidemiology, and the other social sciences all make use of cross-sectional studies in their work. For example, epidemiologists who are interested in the current prevalence of a disease in a certain subset of the population might use
a cross-sectional design to gather and analyze the relevant data. The opposite of a cross-sectional study is a longitudinal study. While cross-sectional studies collect data from
many subjects at a single point in time, longitudinal studies collect data repeatedly from the same subjects over time, often focusing on a smaller group of individuals that are connected by a common trait. Both types are useful for answering different kinds of research questions. A cross-sectional study is a cheap and easy way to gather initial data and identify correlations that can then be investigated further in a longitudinal study. You then decide to design a longitudinal study to further examine this link in younger patients. Without first conducting the cross-sectional study, you would not have known to focus on younger patients in particular. When to use a cross-sectional designWhen you want to examine the prevalence of some outcome at a certain moment in time, a cross-sectional study is the best choice. ExampleYou want to know how many families with children in New York City are currently low-income so you can estimate how much money is required to fund a free lunch program in public schools. Because all you need to know is the current number of low-income families, a cross-sectional study should provide you with all the data you require.Sometimes a cross-sectional study is the best choice for practical reasons – for instance, if you only have the time or money to collect cross-sectional data, or if the only data you can find to answer your research question was gathered at a single point in time. As cross-sectional studies are cheaper and less time-consuming than many other types of study, they allow you to easily collect data that can be used as a basis for further research. Descriptive vs analytical studiesCross-sectional studies can be used for both analytical and descriptive purposes:
How to perform a cross-sectional studyTo implement a cross-sectional study, you can rely on data assembled by another source or collect your own. Governments often make cross-sectional datasets freely available online. Prominent examples include the censuses of several countries like the US or France, which survey a cross-sectional snapshot of the country’s residents on important measures. International organizations like the World Health Organization or the World Bank also provide access to cross-sectional datasets on their websites. However, these datasets are often aggregated to a regional level, which may prevent the investigation of certain research questions. You will also be restricted to whichever variables the original researchers decided to study. If you want to choose the variables in your study and analyze your data on an individual level, you can collect your own data using research methods such as surveys. It’s important to carefully design your questions and choose your sample. Advantages and disadvantages of cross-sectional studiesLike any research design, cross-sectional studies have various benefits and drawbacks. Advantages
Disadvantages
Frequently asked questions about cross-sectional studiesCite this Scribbr articleIf you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.
Is this article helpful?You have already voted. Thanks :-) Your vote is saved :-) Processing your vote... What is a likely explanation for the results from crossWhat is a likely explanation for the results from cross-sectional studies showing that older people are less likely to score as well as younger subjects on traditional intelligence tests? long-term memory.
What is crossCross-Sectional Studies. compares the prevalence of a disease between exposed and unexposed groups. That is why it is sometimes referred to as a "prevalence study" Data are collected on individuals in a population (or sample of a population) about their current disease status, and their previous exposures.
When Developmentalists have fluid and crystallized intelligence to determine if intelligence continues to grow slow or decline with age they determined that ?When developmentalists looked at the two kinds of intelligence, fluid and crystallized, to determine if intelligence continues to grow, slow, or decline with age, they determined what with regards to decline? Yes and No. Yes, because fluid intelligence does decline with age.
Which type of intelligence shows greater decline as we age?Fluid intelligence peaks in the mid 20's and is more likely to decrease with age. Crystallized intelligence is expected to increase.
|