R5 3550h vs i5 8300h so sánh năm 2024

The values for the CPUs below are determined from thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and are updated daily.

• The first section will show basic information for each CPU selected.
• The additional graphs shows the CPU Mark and Single Thread values of each CPU selected.
• An accompany graph, if price data is available, will shows the value for money, in terms of the CPU Mark/Thread Rating per dollar.
• The last section will show approximate yearly running costs for the CPUs.

1Average user usage is typically low and can vary from task to task. An estimate load 25% is nominal. 2Typical power costs vary around the world. Check your last power bill for details. Values of $0.15 to $0.45 per kWh are typical.

AMD Ryzen 5 3550HIntel Core i5-8300H @ 2.30GHzMax TDP35W45WPower consumption per day (kWh)NANARunning cost per dayNANAPower consumption per year (kWh)NANARunning cost per yearNANA

Shown CPU power usage is based on linear interpolation of Max TDP (i.e. max load). Actual CPU power profile may vary.

Comparing Core i5-8300H and Ryzen 5 3550H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingPlace by popularityMarket segmentLaptopLaptopSeriesIntel Core i5AMD Ryzen 5Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-H (2018−2019)Picasso-U (Zen+)Release date2 April 2018 (5 years old)6 January 2019 (5 years old)Launch price (MSRP)$250no dataCurrent price$814 (3.3x MSRP)$734

Technical specs

Core i5-8300H and Ryzen 5 3550H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)Threads88Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.1 GHzBoost clock speed4 GHz3.7 GHzBus support4 × 8 GT/sno dataL1 cache256 KB384 KBL2 cache1 MB2 MBL3 cache8 MB4 MB (shared)Chip lithography14 nm12 nmDie size126 mm2209.78 mm2Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °CMaximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno dataNumber of transistorsno data4940 Million64 bit support++Windows 11 compatibility++Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-8300H and Ryzen 5 3550H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)SocketFCBGA1440FP5Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-8300H and Ryzen 5 3550H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTAES-NI++AVX++Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no dataSpeed Shift+no dataMy WiFi+no dataTurbo Boost Technology2.0no dataHyper-Threading Technology+no dataTSX-no dataIdle States+no dataThermal Monitoring+no dataFlex Memory Access+no dataSIPP-no dataStatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i5-8300H and Ryzen 5 3550H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no dataEDB+no dataSecure Key+no dataMPX+no dataIdentity Protection+no dataSGXYes with Intel® MEno dataOS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-8300H and Ryzen 5 3550H are enumerated here.

AMD-V++VT-d+no dataVT-x+no dataEPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-8300H and Ryzen 5 3550H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4 Dual-channelMaximum memory size64 GB64 GBMax memory channels22Maximum memory bandwidth41.8 GB/s38.4 GB/sECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card CompareIntel UHD Graphics 630AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)Max video memory64 GBno dataQuick Sync Video+no dataClear Video+no dataClear Video HD+no dataGraphics max frequency1 GHzno dataInTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-8300H and Ryzen 5 3550H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no dataeDP+no dataDisplayPort+no dataHDMI+no dataDVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-8300H and Ryzen 5 3550H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no dataMax resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@30Hzno dataMax resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno dataMax resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno dataMax resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-8300H and Ryzen 5 3550H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no dataOpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-8300H and Ryzen 5 3550H.

PCIe version3.03.0PCI Express lanes1612

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 3550H outperforms Core i5-8300H by 5% in our combined benchmark results.

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 5 3550H outperforms Core i5-8300H by 5% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core i5-8300H outperforms Ryzen 5 3550H by 35% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core i5-8300H outperforms Ryzen 5 3550H by 31% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Core i5-8300H outperforms Ryzen 5 3550H by 41% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core i5-8300H outperforms Ryzen 5 3550H by 14% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 5 3550H outperforms Core i5-8300H by 9% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Core i5-8300H outperforms Ryzen 5 3550H by 9% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Core i5-8300H outperforms Ryzen 5 3550H by 18% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Core i5-8300H outperforms Ryzen 5 3550H by 15% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 3550H outperforms Core i5-8300H by 21% in TrueCrypt AES.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Core i5-8300H outperforms Ryzen 5 3550H by 15% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 3550H outperforms Core i5-8300H by 10% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Core i5-8300H outperforms Ryzen 5 3550H by 12% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Core i5-8300H outperforms Ryzen 5 3550H by 4% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score 4.84 5.08 Integrated graphics card 3.08 4.48 Recency 2 April 2018 6 January 2019 Boost clock speed 2300 3700 Base clock speed 2300 2100 Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 35 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core i5-8300H and Ryzen 5 3550H. The differences in performance seem too small.

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-8300H and Ryzen 5 3550H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your own vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Core i5-8300H

Ryzen 5 3550H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

Rate Intel Core i5-8300H on a scale of 1 to 5:

Rate AMD Ryzen 5 3550H on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-8300H or Ryzen 5 3550H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.